Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search Comp.Arch.FPGA



Search tips

fpga by Keywords

Altera | ASIC | CPLD | Cyclone | DCM | DDR | DSP | Ethernet | ISE | JTAG | Linux | LVDS | Microblaze | ML310 | Modelsim | NIOS | OPB | PCI | Quartus | RocketIO | SDRAM | Spartan | Spartan3 | SRAM | Stratix | Verilog | VHDL | Virtex | Virtex-4 | Virtex-II | Xilinx | XST

Ads

See Also

DSPEmbedded SystemsElectronics

Comp.Arch.FPGA | Onchip SRAM Vs Registers

There are 2 messages in this thread.

You are currently looking at messages 0 to 2.

Onchip SRAM Vs Registers - 2005-03-25 10:39:00

Hi all,
   Can anyone tell me what is the threshold point(memory size) to opt
for Onchip SRAM instead of FlipFlops , considering the Power&Area. In a
module I have ~5Kbit of memory implemented as verilog registers. I
would like to know the Power/Area savings if I switch to SRAM instead
of Flipflops. I use .13u process.
 Any links/documents in this regard are highly welcome.
Thanks
Deepu John




Re: Onchip SRAM Vs Registers - Peter Alfke - 2005-03-25 10:58:00

John, your question seems to relate to ASIC
design. This newsgroup
deals with FPGAs where you select and then use a given architecture.
That means the trade-offs are different.
Modern FPGAs have SRAM blocks of various sizes, from 512 bits to 18 k
bits  and even larger. Xilinx offers the RAM option in the Look-up
Tables (LUTs), which can even be used as shift registers.
The designer's decision is to use available resources, not to design
latches or flip-flops.
This can lead to peculiar design optimizations when a certain resource
is abundant and not all used, e.g. BlockRAMs.
5k bit fits very comfortably in one 18 kbit dual-ported BlockRAM, but
would take an inordinate amount of LUTs, even at 16 bits per LUT. You
decide.
Peter Alfke, Xilinx

______________________________
Join the blogging team on FPGARelated.com and earn rewards! Details Here.