There are 7 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 0 to 7.
Hi everyone, I'm trying to understand how the frame addresses have to be decoded for a Virtex-4 FPGA from Xilinx. So far I could find documentation about the configuration for VI and VII FPGAs, but there seem to be small modifications between these models frame addresses and the new Virtex-4. Has anyone already tried to understand frame addresses in Virtex-4? Thanks Bertrand______________________________
Hi Bertrand, did you have a look at the discussion "Xilinx legal" posted here by Austin Leslea on 30.01.2006 ? You won't be allowed to perform bitstream creation... Stephane Bertrand Rousseau wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm trying to understand how the frame addresses have to be decoded for > a Virtex-4 FPGA from Xilinx. So far I could find documentation about > the configuration for VI and VII FPGAs, but there seem to be small > modifications between these models frame addresses and the new > Virtex-4. > > Has anyone already tried to understand frame addresses in Virtex-4? > > Thanks > > Bertrand >
Hi, Actually my work is not about bitstream generation, but bitstream manipulation. I'd like to be able to do some readback operation on my design and replace some parts with another design (partial reconfiguration). Bitstreams will still be generated by xilinx tools and stored in memory, so I'm not generating bitstreams. But I need to be able to address frames in the device in order to make my design possible. Frame addressing for virtex-4 is - as far as I know - undocumented (altough frame addressing for V-II devices is quite well documented), that's why I was wondering if anyone had a clue about this subject. But thanks for the discussion, I did not see it on the list, it is sure a good read to have.______________________________
What about Table 7-5 of ug071.pdf (page 91) ? http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/userguides/ug071.pdf______________________________
Damn! You're totally right. That's incredible I just couldn't see it! Thanks a lot, I should read more carefully. Bertrand______________________________
Actually I just checked my printed version of the UG701, and on the version 1.2 (August 8, 2005) it is not present. Bad luck I suppose, since I printed this version only 2 weeks ago (but I don't remember if I took the version on my computer or the version published on xilinx.com by this time). Morality is: I should always check for updated version.______________________________
When I saw the little "updated" icon next to the link on Xilinx site, I thought you might have read an older version ;) This particular info has been added in the 1.4 revision from the 24th January 2006. (Check the revision history at the beginning of the document for more details on the changes)______________________________