There are 4 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 0 to 4.
I prefer Active-HDL, it has all of the same features as ModelSim and a much better GUI. Plus it has better options for driving signals during a quick simulation run. Although I did find a bug in a recent past version but it has been fixed in the current version. The version of ModelSim at the time didn't have the same problem. ---Matthew Hicks > Jon Elson wrote: > >> ... (I don't know why anyone would WANT to use ModelSim, it seems >> insanely creaky and cumbersome, and I have to relearn the DAMN thing >> every time I use it.) ... >> > Jon, > I've always rather liked modelsim (not its price!) - but I'm not > defending it - I'm just curious if you know of any better solutions > for > simulation. > -Jeff______________________________
On Sep 27, 5:55 pm, Matthew Hicks <mdhic...@uiuc.edu> wrote: > I prefer Active-HDL, it has all of the same features as ModelSim and a much > better GUI. Plus it has better options for driving signals during a quick > simulation run. Although I did find a bug in a recent past version but it > has been fixed in the current version. The version of ModelSim at the time > didn't have the same problem. While we are off topic, I find all the GUI based simulators unbearable slow to use. Icarus Verilog is free, works the same on Mac OSX, Linux, and Windows, and integrates perfectly into a Makefile driven work flow. I can't believe the original posters childish rant could span such a long thread! It must be a slow week. In my experience both A and X are fine companies though neither is perfect. Tommy______________________________
Tommy Thorn <t...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sep 27, 5:55 pm, Matthew Hicks <mdhic...@uiuc.edu> wrote: >> I prefer Active-HDL, it has all of the same features as ModelSim and a much >> better GUI. Plus it has better options for driving signals during a quick >> simulation run. Although I did find a bug in a recent past version but it >> has been fixed in the current version. The version of ModelSim at the time >> didn't have the same problem. > > While we are off topic, I find all the GUI based simulators unbearable > slow to use. Icarus Verilog is free, works the same on Mac OSX, Linux, > and Windows, and integrates perfectly into a Makefile driven work > flow. Modelsim is hardly tied to a GUI - I use a makefile driven flow (Modelsim even has a command for making a makefile!), and often use the simulator in "text-mode" as well. Cheers, Martin -- m...@trw.com TRW Conekt - Consultancy in Engineering, Knowledge and Technology http://www.conekt.net/electronics.html
Matthew Hicks wrote: > I prefer Active-HDL, it has all of the same features as ModelSim and a > much better GUI. Plus it has better options for driving signals during > a quick simulation run. Although I did find a bug in a recent past > version but it has been fixed in the current version. The version of > ModelSim at the time didn't have the same problem. Yes, these sound like many of the things I find cumbersome in ModelSim. I'll have to try out this Active-HDL. Thanks! Jon______________________________