Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search Comp.Arch.FPGA



Search tips

fpga by Keywords

Altera | ASIC | CPLD | Cyclone | DCM | DDR | DSP | Ethernet | ISE | JTAG | Linux | LVDS | Microblaze | ML310 | Modelsim | NIOS | OPB | PCI | Quartus | RocketIO | SDRAM | Spartan | Spartan3 | SRAM | Stratix | Verilog | VHDL | Virtex | Virtex-4 | Virtex-II | Xilinx | XST


Ads

See Also

DSPEmbedded SystemsElectronics

Comp.Arch.FPGA | Microblaze PLB vs. OPB busses

There are 2 messages in this thread.

You are currently looking at messages 0 to 2.

Microblaze PLB vs. OPB busses - Eric Smith - 2007-11-08 20:01:00

Now that Microblaze has support for either PLB or
OPB, what are the
advantages and disadvantages of PLB?  I started looking at the PLB
specification, but I don't yet understand it well enough to have any
feel for how it compares to OPB, or why it might be preferred.

Thanks,
Eric
______________________________
Join the blogging team on FPGARelated.com and earn rewards! Details Here.



Re: Microblaze PLB vs. OPB busses - Jeff Cunningham - 2007-11-08 22:12:00

Eric Smith wrote:
> Now that Microblaze has support for either PLB or OPB, what are the
> advantages and disadvantages of PLB?

PLB can arbitrate and queue the next transaction address during the 
current transaction's dataphase. This potentially reduces the dead time 
between transactions.

Also PLB has separate read and write datapaths, which can operate 
simultaneously in some cases.

I don't know if PLB will make your microblaze go faster, but it 
certainly has potential to make your DMA devices go faster.

-Jeff