Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search Comp.Arch.FPGA



Search tips

fpga by Keywords

Altera | ASIC | CPLD | Cyclone | DCM | DDR | DSP | Ethernet | ISE | JTAG | Linux | LVDS | Microblaze | ML310 | Modelsim | NIOS | OPB | PCI | Quartus | RocketIO | SDRAM | Spartan | Spartan3 | SRAM | Stratix | Verilog | VHDL | Virtex | Virtex-4 | Virtex-II | Xilinx | XST

Ads

See Also

DSPEmbedded SystemsElectronics

Comp.Arch.FPGA | co-sim for handel C with modelsim vs pure modelsim VHDL simulation


There are 2 messages in this thread.

You are currently looking at messages 0 to 2.

co-sim for handel C with modelsim vs pure modelsim VHDL simulation - 2008-04-30 12:25:00

Hi,
  has anybody tried using co-sim for Handel C with modelsim? I managed
to set up the co-sim environment, and got the handel C code to work
with my EDK generated microblaze environment (in VHDL). In short, I am
using handel C to build a peripheral which i attached to microblaze
via the FSL bus.
   The simulation works ok when I used Handel-C + VHDL using the cosim
manager provided by PDK. However, when I used Handel C DK to generate
the VHDL equivalent of the original handel C design, and then re-
simulate, the results are now different.
    The data results which i get from the re-generated core in VHDL is
different from the one which I get when i use PDK's co-sim manager to
interface between microblaze (in VHDL) + the peripheral (in Handel-
C).

Question:
who to trust? should I trust co-sim or should I trust the VHDL
simulator (modelsim)?

any takers on this?

:)
Chris



Re: co-sim for handel C with modelsim vs pure modelsim VHDL simulation - Mike Treseler - 2008-04-30 12:46:00

c...@gmail.com wrote:

> Question:
> who to trust? should I trust co-sim or should I trust the VHDL
> simulator (modelsim)?

I would trust modelsim.
Send your code to Celoxica.

             -- Mike Treseler
______________________________
Join the blogging team on FPGARelated.com and earn rewards! Details Here.