Sign in
Search Comp.Arch.FPGA
fpga by Keywords
Altera | ASIC | CPLD | Cyclone | DCM | DDR | DSP | Ethernet | ISE | JTAG | Linux | LVDS | Microblaze | ML310 | Modelsim | NIOS | OPB | PCI | Quartus | RocketIO | SDRAM | Spartan | Spartan3 | SRAM | Stratix | Verilog | VHDL | Virtex | Virtex-4 | Virtex-II | Xilinx | XST
Ads
See Also
Comp.Arch.FPGA | Re: Is this phase accumulator trick well-known???
There are 1 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 0 to 1.
Re: Is this phase accumulator trick well-known??? - Brian Drummond - 2009-02-09 19:13:00
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:03:01 +0000, Jonathan Bromley <j...@MYCOMPANY.com> wrote: >let's see what the bug report should look like... > > Dear Xilinx, > XST compiled my code exactly the way I wanted it. > Please fix XST so that it will NOT compile my code. > Yours sincerely, > A. Masochist. > >I don't see Xilinx exactly being flooded with >that kind of case; do you? :-) Which explains quite a lot about the non-compliance of XST. And, arguably, it doesn't matter, because the code has already been thoroughly vetted in simulation, hasn't it? :-) It does get a bit more interesting when there are similar-looking (but different) entities with the same name, e.g. in different libraries, and XST picks the wrong one... - Brian
