There are 3 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 0 to 3.
Hi all, I'm working on a Virtex5 xc5vlx50 and in my design I need to use some block ram. I generated the core with core generator, but when I implement the design I got this warning during mapping: WARNING:Pack:231 - trimming timing constraints from pin hit2/RAM1/BU2/ U0/blk_mem_generator/valid.cstr/ramloop[0].ram.r/v5_init.ram/TR UE_DP.SINGLE_PRIM36.TDP of frag REGCLKBL connected to power/ground net hit2/RAM1/BU2/U0/blk_mem_generator/valid.cstr/ramloop[0].ram.r/ v5_init.ram/TR UE_DP.SINGLE_PRIM36.TDP_REGCLKBL_tiesig Does anyone knows what it mean and how can i fix it? I found nothing neither on the xilinx site nor on the web Thanks all Bye Dek
Dek, It is a warning: you do not necessarily have to fix it. The tools are telling you that a net to a constant (1=power, or 0=ground) had its timing constraint removed (ignored). That is a perfectly OK thing to do. It is up to you to read each warning, and check out what it means. This one is easy, let it go. Austin
On 22 Feb, 16:45, austin <aus...@xilinx.com> wrote: > Dek, > > It is a warning: =A0you do not necessarily have to fix it. > > The tools are telling you that a net to a constant (1=3Dpower, or > 0=3Dground) had its timing constraint removed (ignored). > > That is a perfectly OK thing to do. > > It is up to you to read each warning, and check out what it means. > > This one is easy, let it go. > > Austin Hi Austin Thanks for the reply; the point is that I have a project that uses some block ram; In functional simulation everything works fine, when I do synthesys and place and route I got no errors, no timing related problems, and just 2 kind of warnings: Xst:2211: ... line 130: Instantiating black box module <ram_128> ( see http://groups.google.it/group/comp.lang.vhdl/browse_thread/thread/cf7= 02b52f28c2674/702ad29181e18171#702ad29181e18171 ) and Pack:231 - trimming timing constraints from pin as described above If I try to do a post layout simulation of this design with Modelsim; I got this warning: # ** Warning: /X_FF HOLD Low VIOLATION ON I WITH RESPECT TO CLK; # Expected :=3D 0.195 ns; Observed :=3D 0.006 ns; At : 191.527 ns # Time: 191527 ps Iteration: 1 Instance: /newdaedalus_tb/top/ control_cnt_0 and the design does not behave like in functional analysis. I also implemented the bitfile on real hardware but it doesn't work. That's why I was asking about that warning, because I really can't get where the problem could be... I'm using the block ram @ 40 MHz, but it shouldn't be a problem, right? Thanks Bye Dek______________________________