Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search Comp.Arch.FPGA



Search tips

fpga by Keywords

Altera | ASIC | CPLD | Cyclone | DCM | DDR | DSP | Ethernet | ISE | JTAG | Linux | LVDS | Microblaze | ML310 | Modelsim | NIOS | OPB | PCI | Quartus | RocketIO | SDRAM | Spartan | Spartan3 | SRAM | Stratix | Verilog | VHDL | Virtex | Virtex-4 | Virtex-II | Xilinx | XST

Ads

See Also

DSPEmbedded SystemsElectronics

Comp.Arch.FPGA | Quality of timing simulation

There are 1 messages in this thread.

You are currently looking at messages 0 to 1.

Quality of timing simulation - ALuPin - 2004-05-18 05:13:00

Hello newsgroup users,

I have made a timing simulation for my SRAM-Controller and an external
asynchronous SRAM.

I have used the FPGA Cyclone timing output file for my SRAM-Controller
and the extra timing file for the SRAM model.
Both components have been instantiated in a testbench.


How reliable are such simulations? 
Where do come problems along with that kind of simulations ?  
Is it recommendable to simulate that way when connecting some
synchronous design with some asynchronous component?

I would appreciate your help or your field report about your timing
simulation.

Thanks a lot.

Rgds
______________________________
Join the blogging team on FPGARelated.com and earn rewards! Details Here.