> Hi Austin,
>
> when are we to expect 8.1i ?
>
> BR
>
> Austin Lesea wrote:
>
>> http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/userguides/ug071.pdf
>>
>> page 69 (1312 bits, of which 12 are the FRAME_ECC syndrome), and
>> continuing
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/appnotes/xapp714.pdf
>>
>> So a larger device has a number of vertical frames (not just two).
>>
>> Austin
>>
>> Andreas Nett wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everybody,
>>>
>>> I'm working on dynamic partial reconfiguration of Xilinx Virtex-II
>>> FPGAs. In all Virtex-Device-Families the smallest (re-)configurable
>>> unit is a FRAME. I know that in Virtex and Virtex-II, these Frames
>>> are running from the top of the device to the bottom. This means that
>>> during reconfiguration of a module in the center of the device, no
>>> signals can get from the left side to the right side.
>>>
>>> I heard that in Virtex-4, frames didn't go from the top of the device
>>> to the bottom but, that there were upper and a lower frames which
>>> could also be addressed separately. This would be helpful, concerning
>>> the problem described above. Unfortunately I didn't find any
>>> information on this topic in the Xilinx Data Sheets.
>>>
>>> Now, my question is: Are there upper and lower frames in a Virtex-4?
>>> Or do Virtex-4 frames look like the frames in Virtex and Virtex-II?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance Andreas
Reply by Stephane●November 18, 20052005-11-18
Hi Austin,
when are we to expect 8.1i ?
BR
Austin Lesea wrote:
> http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/userguides/ug071.pdf
>
> page 69 (1312 bits, of which 12 are the FRAME_ECC syndrome), and continuing
>
> and
>
> http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/appnotes/xapp714.pdf
>
> So a larger device has a number of vertical frames (not just two).
>
> Austin
>
> Andreas Nett wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I'm working on dynamic partial reconfiguration of Xilinx Virtex-II
>> FPGAs. In all Virtex-Device-Families the smallest (re-)configurable
>> unit is a FRAME. I know that in Virtex and Virtex-II, these Frames are
>> running from the top of the device to the bottom. This means that
>> during reconfiguration of a module in the center of the device, no
>> signals can get from the left side to the right side.
>>
>> I heard that in Virtex-4, frames didn't go from the top of the device
>> to the bottom but, that there were upper and a lower frames which
>> could also be addressed separately. This would be helpful, concerning
>> the problem described above. Unfortunately I didn't find any
>> information on this topic in the Xilinx Data Sheets.
>>
>> Now, my question is: Are there upper and lower frames in a Virtex-4?
>> Or do Virtex-4 frames look like the frames in Virtex and Virtex-II?
>>
>> Thanks in advance Andreas
Reply by Austin Lesea●November 18, 20052005-11-18
http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/userguides/ug071.pdf
page 69 (1312 bits, of which 12 are the FRAME_ECC syndrome), and continuing
and
http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/appnotes/xapp714.pdf
So a larger device has a number of vertical frames (not just two).
Austin
Andreas Nett wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm working on dynamic partial reconfiguration of Xilinx Virtex-II FPGAs. In all Virtex-Device-Families the smallest (re-)configurable unit is a FRAME. I know that in Virtex and Virtex-II, these Frames are running from the top of the device to the bottom. This means that during reconfiguration of a module in the center of the device, no signals can get from the left side to the right side.
>
> I heard that in Virtex-4, frames didn't go from the top of the device to the bottom but, that there were upper and a lower frames which could also be addressed separately. This would be helpful, concerning the problem described above. Unfortunately I didn't find any information on this topic in the Xilinx Data Sheets.
>
> Now, my question is: Are there upper and lower frames in a Virtex-4? Or do Virtex-4 frames look like the frames in Virtex and Virtex-II?
>
> Thanks in advance Andreas
Reply by Stephane●November 18, 20052005-11-18
Andreas Nett wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm working on dynamic partial reconfiguration of Xilinx Virtex-II FPGAs. In all Virtex-Device-Families the smallest (re-)configurable unit is a FRAME. I know that in Virtex and Virtex-II, these Frames are running from the top of the device to the bottom. This means that during reconfiguration of a module in the center of the device, no signals can get from the left side to the right side.
>
> I heard that in Virtex-4, frames didn't go from the top of the device to the bottom but, that there were upper and a lower frames which could also be addressed separately. This would be helpful, concerning the problem described above. Unfortunately I didn't find any information on this topic in the Xilinx Data Sheets.
>
> Now, my question is: Are there upper and lower frames in a Virtex-4? Or do Virtex-4 frames look like the frames in Virtex and Virtex-II?
>
> Thanks in advance Andreas
The height that a frame covers is a clock region, and the number of
regions depends of your V4 size.
You'll find additional infos on the dedicated mailing list:
http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/partial-reconfig/
Don't loose time with the tools: it is said that ISE 8.1i will address
this issue with V4, but yet I've seen no date of availability. Anyone?
Reply by Andreas Nett●November 18, 20052005-11-18
Hello everybody,
I'm working on dynamic partial reconfiguration of Xilinx Virtex-II FPGAs. In all Virtex-Device-Families the smallest (re-)configurable unit is a FRAME. I know that in Virtex and Virtex-II, these Frames are running from the top of the device to the bottom. This means that during reconfiguration of a module in the center of the device, no signals can get from the left side to the right side.
I heard that in Virtex-4, frames didn't go from the top of the device to the bottom but, that there were upper and a lower frames which could also be addressed separately. This would be helpful, concerning the problem described above. Unfortunately I didn't find any information on this topic in the Xilinx Data Sheets.
Now, my question is: Are there upper and lower frames in a Virtex-4? Or do Virtex-4 frames look like the frames in Virtex and Virtex-II?
Thanks in advance Andreas