Reply by Austin Lesea November 18, 20052005-11-18
Stephane,

http://www.xilinx.com/cgi-bin/power_tool/power_Virtex4

is a new version of the web power tool, but for the full ISE 8.1i, I 
think that is still yet to be announced ... soon.

Austin

Stephane wrote:

> Hi Austin, > > when are we to expect 8.1i ? > > BR > > Austin Lesea wrote: > >> http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/userguides/ug071.pdf >> >> page 69 (1312 bits, of which 12 are the FRAME_ECC syndrome), and >> continuing >> >> and >> >> http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/appnotes/xapp714.pdf >> >> So a larger device has a number of vertical frames (not just two). >> >> Austin >> >> Andreas Nett wrote: >> >>> Hello everybody, >>> >>> I'm working on dynamic partial reconfiguration of Xilinx Virtex-II >>> FPGAs. In all Virtex-Device-Families the smallest (re-)configurable >>> unit is a FRAME. I know that in Virtex and Virtex-II, these Frames >>> are running from the top of the device to the bottom. This means that >>> during reconfiguration of a module in the center of the device, no >>> signals can get from the left side to the right side. >>> >>> I heard that in Virtex-4, frames didn't go from the top of the device >>> to the bottom but, that there were upper and a lower frames which >>> could also be addressed separately. This would be helpful, concerning >>> the problem described above. Unfortunately I didn't find any >>> information on this topic in the Xilinx Data Sheets. >>> >>> Now, my question is: Are there upper and lower frames in a Virtex-4? >>> Or do Virtex-4 frames look like the frames in Virtex and Virtex-II? >>> >>> Thanks in advance Andreas
Reply by Stephane November 18, 20052005-11-18
Hi Austin,

when are we to expect 8.1i ?

BR

Austin Lesea wrote:

> http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/userguides/ug071.pdf > > page 69 (1312 bits, of which 12 are the FRAME_ECC syndrome), and continuing > > and > > http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/appnotes/xapp714.pdf > > So a larger device has a number of vertical frames (not just two). > > Austin > > Andreas Nett wrote: > >> Hello everybody, >> >> I'm working on dynamic partial reconfiguration of Xilinx Virtex-II >> FPGAs. In all Virtex-Device-Families the smallest (re-)configurable >> unit is a FRAME. I know that in Virtex and Virtex-II, these Frames are >> running from the top of the device to the bottom. This means that >> during reconfiguration of a module in the center of the device, no >> signals can get from the left side to the right side. >> >> I heard that in Virtex-4, frames didn't go from the top of the device >> to the bottom but, that there were upper and a lower frames which >> could also be addressed separately. This would be helpful, concerning >> the problem described above. Unfortunately I didn't find any >> information on this topic in the Xilinx Data Sheets. >> >> Now, my question is: Are there upper and lower frames in a Virtex-4? >> Or do Virtex-4 frames look like the frames in Virtex and Virtex-II? >> >> Thanks in advance Andreas
Reply by Austin Lesea November 18, 20052005-11-18
http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/userguides/ug071.pdf

page 69 (1312 bits, of which 12 are the FRAME_ECC syndrome), and continuing

and

http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/appnotes/xapp714.pdf

So a larger device has a number of vertical frames (not just two).

Austin

Andreas Nett wrote:

> Hello everybody, > > I'm working on dynamic partial reconfiguration of Xilinx Virtex-II FPGAs. In all Virtex-Device-Families the smallest (re-)configurable unit is a FRAME. I know that in Virtex and Virtex-II, these Frames are running from the top of the device to the bottom. This means that during reconfiguration of a module in the center of the device, no signals can get from the left side to the right side. > > I heard that in Virtex-4, frames didn't go from the top of the device to the bottom but, that there were upper and a lower frames which could also be addressed separately. This would be helpful, concerning the problem described above. Unfortunately I didn't find any information on this topic in the Xilinx Data Sheets. > > Now, my question is: Are there upper and lower frames in a Virtex-4? Or do Virtex-4 frames look like the frames in Virtex and Virtex-II? > > Thanks in advance Andreas
Reply by Stephane November 18, 20052005-11-18
Andreas Nett wrote:
> Hello everybody, > > I'm working on dynamic partial reconfiguration of Xilinx Virtex-II FPGAs. In all Virtex-Device-Families the smallest (re-)configurable unit is a FRAME. I know that in Virtex and Virtex-II, these Frames are running from the top of the device to the bottom. This means that during reconfiguration of a module in the center of the device, no signals can get from the left side to the right side. > > I heard that in Virtex-4, frames didn't go from the top of the device to the bottom but, that there were upper and a lower frames which could also be addressed separately. This would be helpful, concerning the problem described above. Unfortunately I didn't find any information on this topic in the Xilinx Data Sheets. > > Now, my question is: Are there upper and lower frames in a Virtex-4? Or do Virtex-4 frames look like the frames in Virtex and Virtex-II? > > Thanks in advance Andreas
The height that a frame covers is a clock region, and the number of regions depends of your V4 size. You'll find additional infos on the dedicated mailing list: http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~listarch/partial-reconfig/ Don't loose time with the tools: it is said that ISE 8.1i will address this issue with V4, but yet I've seen no date of availability. Anyone?
Reply by Andreas Nett November 18, 20052005-11-18
Hello everybody,

I'm working on dynamic partial reconfiguration of Xilinx Virtex-II FPGAs. In all Virtex-Device-Families the smallest (re-)configurable unit is a FRAME. I know that in Virtex and Virtex-II, these Frames are running from the top of the device to the bottom. This means that during reconfiguration of a module in the center of the device, no signals can get from the left side to the right side.

I heard that in Virtex-4, frames didn't go from the top of the device to the bottom but, that there were upper and a lower frames which could also be addressed separately. This would be helpful, concerning the problem described above. Unfortunately I didn't find any information on this topic in the Xilinx Data Sheets.

Now, my question is: Are there upper and lower frames in a Virtex-4? Or do Virtex-4 frames look like the frames in Virtex and Virtex-II?

Thanks in advance Andreas