Does better math skills really equal a better engineer in the future?
>Math Skills = >Engineer ?
Started by ●June 14, 2004
Reply by ●June 15, 20042004-06-15
defiantly.. all that math you try to forget at school will suddenly become useful when you start calculating track impedance and capacitor reactance Simon <user@domain.invalid> wrote in message news:w8tzc.540$XFF1.47@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...> Does better math skills really equal a better engineer in the future? >
Reply by ●June 15, 20042004-06-15
user@domain.invalid a �crit:> Does better math skills really equal a better engineer in the future?No, although it helps -- ____ _ __ ___ | _ \_)/ _|/ _ \ Adresse de retour invalide: retirez le - | | | | | (_| |_| | Invalid return address: remove the - |_| |_|_|\__|\___/
Reply by ●June 15, 20042004-06-15
not exactly equal...but you will impress the client when you give the frequency of a timing path of 14.4ns without using a calculator...:) Kelvin <user@domain.invalid> wrote in message news:w8tzc.540$XFF1.47@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...> Does better math skills really equal a better engineer in the future? >
Reply by ●June 15, 20042004-06-15
"Kelvin" <student@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:40ce99dc@news.starhub.net.sg...> not exactly equal...but you will impress the client when you give the > frequency of a > timing path of 14.4ns without using a calculator...:) > > Kelvin >That's not maths skill, that's arithmetic skill. For any technical profession you need to be fast and reliable at basic arithmetic - if you have difficulty working out how a 4.7uF capacitor compares to a 4700nF capacitor, you will have problems. But no one is going to blame you for using a calculator to multiply it by a 33k resistance. Maths skill is something else - it is about logical thinking, reasoning, and analysis. The skill is in the ability to work with symbolic representations, to understand, manipulate and interprete such systems, with a care for the details and an attention to all special cases, while still being able to sort the relevant from the irrelevant. In short, maths is most important as training for your mind (although obviously particular branches of maths are directly relevant to particular branches of engineering). It's not enough on its own, but if you are not good at maths, or don't study enough maths, then you will have great difficulty being a good engineer (except perhaps a social engineer...).
Reply by ●June 15, 20042004-06-15
it's true... but it's no big deal to calculate 47X33 anyway... arithmetic is part of mathematics...every engineer needs to be proficient in math... Kelvin "David Brown" <david@no.westcontrol.spam.com> wrote in message news:cam9d4$npo$1@news.netpower.no...> > "Kelvin" <student@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:40ce99dc@news.starhub.net.sg... > > not exactly equal...but you will impress the client when you give the > > frequency of a > > timing path of 14.4ns without using a calculator...:) > > > > Kelvin > > > > That's not maths skill, that's arithmetic skill. > > For any technical profession you need to be fast and reliable at basic > arithmetic - if you have difficulty working out how a 4.7uF capacitor > compares to a 4700nF capacitor, you will have problems. But no one isgoing> to blame you for using a calculator to multiply it by a 33k resistance. > > Maths skill is something else - it is about logical thinking, reasoning,and> analysis. The skill is in the ability to work with symbolic > representations, to understand, manipulate and interprete such systems,with> a care for the details and an attention to all special cases, while still > being able to sort the relevant from the irrelevant. In short, maths is > most important as training for your mind (although obviously particular > branches of maths are directly relevant to particular branches of > engineering). > > It's not enough on its own, but if you are not good at maths, or don'tstudy> enough maths, then you will have great difficulty being a good engineer > (except perhaps a social engineer...). > > >
Reply by ●June 15, 20042004-06-15
"Kelvin" <student@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:40cece16$1@news.starhub.net.sg...> it's true... > > but it's no big deal to calculate 47X33 anyway... > > arithmetic is part of mathematics...every engineer needs to be proficientin> math... > > Kelvin >Arithmetic is to maths what letters are to English, or perhaps what handwriting is to essay-writing - you can get a computer to help with the larger stuff as long as you understand what you are doing, but it's going to be a pain if you need a computer for every little note, and being able to write well does not make you a good essay writer. There are three sorts of mathematicians - those who can count, and those who can't. There are 10 sorts of software engineers - those that understand binary, and those who don't. Anyway, we agree that an engineer needs to be good at maths. David> > > > > "David Brown" <david@no.westcontrol.spam.com> wrote in message > news:cam9d4$npo$1@news.netpower.no... > > > > "Kelvin" <student@nowhere.com> wrote in message > > news:40ce99dc@news.starhub.net.sg... > > > not exactly equal...but you will impress the client when you give the > > > frequency of a > > > timing path of 14.4ns without using a calculator...:) > > > > > > Kelvin > > > > > > > That's not maths skill, that's arithmetic skill. > > > > For any technical profession you need to be fast and reliable at basic > > arithmetic - if you have difficulty working out how a 4.7uF capacitor > > compares to a 4700nF capacitor, you will have problems. But no one is > going > > to blame you for using a calculator to multiply it by a 33k resistance. > > > > Maths skill is something else - it is about logical thinking, reasoning, > and > > analysis. The skill is in the ability to work with symbolic > > representations, to understand, manipulate and interprete such systems, > with > > a care for the details and an attention to all special cases, whilestill> > being able to sort the relevant from the irrelevant. In short, maths is > > most important as training for your mind (although obviously particular > > branches of maths are directly relevant to particular branches of > > engineering). > > > > It's not enough on its own, but if you are not good at maths, or don't > study > > enough maths, then you will have great difficulty being a good engineer > > (except perhaps a social engineer...). > > > > > > > >
Reply by ●June 15, 20042004-06-15
Engineer math skill is what remains after you forget everything in school, and what's gain from works.
Reply by ●June 15, 20042004-06-15
Kelvin <student@nowhere.com> wrote: : it's true... : but it's no big deal to calculate 47X33 anyway... Well, start with 50X30 , we're engineers :-) -- Uwe Bonnes bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
Reply by ●June 15, 20042004-06-15






