Every thing is correct. But i cant simply change my design. What i am thinking now is to proceed with the 120 register version. If required i can switch over to Virtex "XC2V8000". Will that help (with 8M gates). But i am still wondering why Xilinx is not doing any synthesizing work. And about your code is there any way to implement the same in verilog. I dont know VHDL.
Prob in Synthesizing and Simulating large Mux
Started by ●September 30, 2005
Reply by ●October 3, 20052005-10-03
Reply by ●October 4, 20052005-10-04
Of course there is an identical way to implement VHDL in verilog... unfortunately I don't know verilog either :-) A XC2V8000 wow.. you must have a seriously huge budgie.. $8,300 each.. :-) 4 XC3S1000's would only cost you about $220. only 4,000 LUT's.. but I bet it would fit too .. that's why I suggested using 4 FPGA's in the first place. Simon "vssumesh" <vssumesh_asic@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1128344153.831983.257240@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...> Every thing is correct. But i cant simply change my design. What i am > thinking now is to proceed with the 120 register version. > If required i can switch over to Virtex "XC2V8000". Will that help > (with 8M gates). > But i am still wondering why Xilinx is not doing any synthesizing work. > And about your code is there any way to implement the same in verilog. > I dont know VHDL. >
Reply by ●October 4, 20052005-10-04
The problem is i want that in a single chip. How can i link those huge control signals out of FPGA. But i am still wondering why the ISE is not working with my design. Ok any way i am proceeding with 120 registers and will let all of you know the results. Thanks for all the advice and suggestions.
Reply by ●October 4, 20052005-10-04
vssumesh wrote:> The problem is i want that in a single chip. How can i link those huge > control signals out of FPGA. > But i am still wondering why the ISE is not working with my design.Probably because your expectations are not inline with the device capability? You're trying to create a huge combinatorial mux. It's not at all a surprise that you're not meeting your timing requirements. -a
Reply by ●October 5, 20052005-10-05
you don't link.. you replicate! Simon "vssumesh" <vssumesh_asic@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1128426984.140362.116640@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...> The problem is i want that in a single chip. How can i link those huge > control signals out of FPGA. > But i am still wondering why the ISE is not working with my design. Ok > any way i am proceeding with 120 registers and will let all of you know > the results. > Thanks for all the advice and suggestions. >
Reply by ●October 5, 20052005-10-05
Reply by ●October 6, 20052005-10-06
one way is to simply serialize the data using LVDS.. the other is to simply replicate the input in each device the each device handles only 1/4 of the selection. Partly it depends on how/where your data is coming from. I can't tell you how to do it... you have to analyse and learn Simon "vssumesh" <vssumesh_asic@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1128515181.357701.217050@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...> I didn't understand that. How can i interconnect the huge routing > signals between the FPGA's. >






