Reading the LSI Strucutred ASIC fiasco thread has made me think. People are saying the FPGA revenues are going to grow, so.... Which markets are FPGA heading into? I mean, at the moment there's Comms, Medical, Military, Consumer. Where are they going next? Automotive I guess is coming, as is aerospace. You could put the two together, as control electronics. How about seeing them in a PC? What are your views on the matter?
Where are FPGA heading?
Started by ●March 16, 2006
Reply by ●March 16, 20062006-03-16
John C <brakepiston@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:>Reading the LSI Strucutred ASIC fiasco thread has made me think. >People are saying the FPGA revenues are going to grow, so....>Which markets are FPGA heading into?>I mean, at the moment there's Comms, Medical, Military, Consumer. >Where are they going next?>Automotive I guess is coming, as is aerospace. You could put the two >together, as control electronics.Aerospace posses issues with ionizing radiation.>How about seeing them in a PC?When there's an advantage of reconfiguration ability over static asic massproduced at low price. A possible app could be builtin reciever for television, modem etc.. that can be adapted fast to new codecs post manufacture.
Reply by ●March 16, 20062006-03-16
I want a board with a few of the largest Spartan3e chips, a little SRAM, and a PCIExpress 8x slot and controller for under $300. Until that happens, FPGAs are not in the consumer market in my opinion. All the current consumer boards lack one necessary feature for general purpose acceleration and coprocessing: datastream bandwidth. Tinkering with gates (like one would do with current Digilent starter kits) should not be considered a consumer product; that is in the hobbiest arena. I've worked with the FPGAs in the military some. They use it mostly for image de/compression and de/encryption -- the obvious uses for them. Bandwidth is a huge concern on every FPGA application I've ever worked with, especially with the military. I just wish that thinking would propagate down to the consumer level. Somehow the graphics card companies seem to have a grip on it, while other general coprocessing hardware seems to have been skipped over lightly.
Reply by ●March 16, 20062006-03-16
John C, Automotive is happening (big) right now. Latest (can't say which) luxury car has 10+ Xilinx FPGAs in it. One car. 10+ FPGAs. Replaced all the microcontrollers. Why? Because the microcontrollers can not be maintained for ten years, whereas the car maker can always buy any future version of our FPGA, and put their old VHDL/verilog into it. Maintaining stock for all cars sold for replacement assemblies for ten years was driving the maker broke (pun intended). Consumer is going gangbusters. LCD TV's, plasma panel TV's. Why? Because ASICs are a bad investment. The actual number of TVs sold for each country is small compared to the overall numbers. Each country is just slightly different. The TVs change every six months. So making TVs for Taiwan, China, Japan, Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, etc. etc. is a huge headache. And if the ASIC doesn't work, the risk is enormous. PC's? Already there, but it is small compared to everything else. We are in video display cards (I have one in my home PC, which can drive two displays at once, and the mouse will go from one to the next...). We are in high end accelerator cards, instrumentation cards, etc. Still like to see more business here, and it will happen with PCI express which is just starting to ramp now. Military/Aerospace Huge growth here. Why? Because ASICs are really pretty much dead for this market. Not because of cost (which helps), but because of reprogramability. The "mission" changes, and thus if the entire jet fighter is "soft" or "firm" it can be reprogrammed... And there is the software defined radio retrofit of all military forces for all allies and their partners (read the whole world, pretty much) and the homeland security need to retrofit all public safety (police fire medical) radios to interoperate with the military... Embedded systems Everywhere there is a processor + stuff. A 20 billion $ market, which we are able to contribute to. More than 40% of it is Power PC based. So we play well here, and add a lot of value with our EMACs, APU interface, 405PPC, and thousands of programmable CLBs. 'Extreme' DSP Anytime you can't solve the problem with a DSP processor. Or when you need peripherals for a DSP processor (you then use a FPGA instead). Another 20 billion $ market which we play in the top end of. Cell phone base stations, medical scanners, so on and so forth. Looks like there is growth (for us), and lots of it, in our future. Of course, that is our perspective, which is from where we sit, and what we see happening. Others will have their view. Austin
Reply by ●March 16, 20062006-03-16
pd.... -snip->>Automotive I guess is coming, as is aerospace. You could put the two >>together, as control electronics.Both there now. Account for them as you will. We have a Aerospace/Defense/Automotive Division today.> Aerospace posses issues with ionizing radiation.Which is why we offer the QPro series, and have onging research into solving all the problems in these applications. -snip again-> When there's an advantage of reconfiguration ability over static asic > massproduced at low price. A possible app could be builtin reciever for > television, modem etc.. that can be adapted fast to new codecs > post manufacture.Already in them. The sets are programmed just as they are leaving (for country, etc.). Austin
Reply by ●March 16, 20062006-03-16
Consumer items do have the advantage of volume manufacture and recovery of development costs on a few hundred board does tend to make them dearer than that market never mind thge dearer manufacture costs. Wait a long while and maybe and our Raggedstone2 will bring what you want but don't expect it this side of Christmas. It's on the roadmap but not for a long long time yet. Broaddown3 when it releases will have some what you want and probably dearer than you want to pay. John Adair Enterpoint Ltd. - Home of Raggedstone1. The Low Cost Spartan-3 Development Board. http://www.enterpoint.co.uk "Brannon" <brannonking@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1142524628.903506.159270@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...>I want a board with a few of the largest Spartan3e chips, a little > SRAM, and a PCIExpress 8x slot and controller for under $300. Until > that happens, FPGAs are not in the consumer market in my opinion. All > the current consumer boards lack one necessary feature for general > purpose acceleration and coprocessing: datastream bandwidth. Tinkering > with gates (like one would do with current Digilent starter kits) > should not be considered a consumer product; that is in the hobbiest > arena. > > I've worked with the FPGAs in the military some. They use it mostly for > image de/compression and de/encryption -- the obvious uses for them. > Bandwidth is a huge concern on every FPGA application I've ever worked > with, especially with the military. I just wish that thinking would > propagate down to the consumer level. Somehow the graphics card > companies seem to have a grip on it, while other general coprocessing > hardware seems to have been skipped over lightly. >
Reply by ●March 16, 20062006-03-16
Austin Lesea wrote:> pd.... > > -snip- > >> Aerospace posses issues with ionizing radiation. > > Which is why we offer the QPro series, and have onging research into > solving all the problems in these applications. >I'm surprised you didn't mention that quite a few FPGAs, including Xilinx FPGAs, have been roaming around the surface of Mars for the past two years. And while a few mechanical parts are starting to wear out, the FPGAs are still going strong.
Reply by ●March 16, 20062006-03-16
In message <ifmi1218qkjo36fnvf3mk21p6n2k4mv39m@4ax.com>
John C <brakepiston@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Reading the LSI Strucutred ASIC fiasco thread has made me think.
> People are saying the FPGA revenues are going to grow, so....
>
> Which markets are FPGA heading into?
>
> I mean, at the moment there's Comms, Medical, Military, Consumer.
>
> Where are they going next?
>
> Automotive I guess is coming, as is aerospace. You could put the two
> together, as control electronics.
>
> How about seeing them in a PC?
See http://www.microdigital.info
Altho the company seems to have ceased trading, there are a few of us who
have units.
It uses Spartan xc2s200's, one to implement a northbridge and one as a
memory controller and graphic engine. A xc95144 is used to boot them and
provide memory control.
NOTE this is not a windows machine, but is a RISCOS (http://www.riscos.com)
machine with an ARM based processor.
>
> What are your views on the matter?
--
webmaster@tankstage.co.uk
Iyonix PC
Reply by ●March 16, 20062006-03-16
Duane, Yes! Exciting, but not very high volume. 12 XCV1000's. Times 2. Austin Duane Clark wrote:> Austin Lesea wrote: > >> pd.... >> >> -snip- >> >>> Aerospace posses issues with ionizing radiation. >> >> >> Which is why we offer the QPro series, and have onging research into >> solving all the problems in these applications. >> > > I'm surprised you didn't mention that quite a few FPGAs, including > Xilinx FPGAs, have been roaming around the surface of Mars for the past > two years. And while a few mechanical parts are starting to wear out, > the FPGAs are still going strong.
Reply by ●March 16, 20062006-03-16
Austin Lesea wrote:> John C, > > Automotive is happening (big) right now. > > Latest (can't say which) luxury car has 10+ Xilinx FPGAs in it. > > One car. > > 10+ FPGAs. > > Replaced all the microcontrollers. > > Why? Because the microcontrollers can not be maintained for ten years, > whereas the car maker can always buy any future version of our FPGA, and > put their old VHDL/verilog into it. Maintaining stock for all cars sold > for replacement assemblies for ten years was driving the maker broke > (pun intended).?!? - I'm hoping this is just Austin's enthusiasm, because if the Luxury Car vendor really believed this, that is truly scary. Would YOU drive off, in your luxury car, in 10 years time, where they had 'just respun' the VHDL code, thru new tools, into the newest FPGA ( _and_ assuming that newest FPGA _AND_ PCB will physically fit at all !? ). This is nothing but a lawyer's feeding trough.... -jg





