FPGARelated.com
Forums

OpenSPARC released

Started by Pablo Bleyer Kocik March 21, 2006
 For those who are interested, SUN released Open SPARC today:

 http://opensparc-t1.sunsource.net/download_hw.html

 Verilog RTL, verification and simulation tools included.

 Cheers.

--
PabloBleyerKocik /"Person who say it cannot be done
 pablo          / should not interrupt person doing it."
  @bleyer.org  / -- Chinese proverb

What's the betting that Antti is the first to get this going on an
FPGA?
Though I imagine it is huge when synthesized...

Pablo Bleyer Kocik wrote:
> For those who are interested, SUN released Open SPARC today: > > http://opensparc-t1.sunsource.net/download_hw.html > > Verilog RTL, verification and simulation tools included. > > Cheers. > > -- > PabloBleyerKocik /"Person who say it cannot be done > pablo / should not interrupt person doing it." > @bleyer.org / -- Chinese proverb
John McGrath wrote:
> What's the betting that Antti is the first to get this going on an > FPGA? > Though I imagine it is huge when synthesized...
Has anyone seen Sizes / and MHz for this, finally sitting in a FPGA ? How does it compare with Leon ? -jg
> > Pablo Bleyer Kocik wrote: > >>For those who are interested, SUN released Open SPARC today: >> >> http://opensparc-t1.sunsource.net/download_hw.html
Hihi,

I was thinking about that at the time of the first announcement (a few
months ago), but well I will sure look at it, and decide what todo
(if).

but funny you asked, I am considering adopting some micro for one
specific FPGA right now, but it would need to fit with SDRAM controller
into 3000LUTs and there must be uclinux support for it. its very tight
if doable using existing cores so I may end up re-writing something

Antti

Hi Pablo,
Thank you for your useful information.

Weng

??

I wonder if there is any reason why it would be useful to compile the 
verilog for a FPGA?

Austin

Pablo Bleyer Kocik wrote:

> For those who are interested, SUN released Open SPARC today: > > http://opensparc-t1.sunsource.net/download_hw.html > > Verilog RTL, verification and simulation tools included. > > Cheers. > > -- > PabloBleyerKocik /"Person who say it cannot be done > pablo / should not interrupt person doing it." > @bleyer.org / -- Chinese proverb >
Austin Lesea wrote:
> ?? > > I wonder if there is any reason why it would be useful to compile the > verilog for a FPGA? > > Austin > > Pablo Bleyer Kocik wrote: > > > For those who are interested, SUN released Open SPARC today: > > > > http://opensparc-t1.sunsource.net/download_hw.html > > > > Verilog RTL, verification and simulation tools included. > > > > Cheers. > > > > -- > > PabloBleyerKocik /"Person who say it cannot be done > > pablo / should not interrupt person doing it." > > @bleyer.org / -- Chinese proverb > >
I can imagine no practical use. But it sure is fun to do :). -Isaac
 Errr... To start developing and testing a SoC based on OpenSPARC
interfaced to a custom digital block in an FPGA? CPU cores + FPGA
blocks seem to be resurrecting now. Also, a bunch of companies are
working strongly on FPAAs and other analog configurable architectures
(this time done right). If we have 8051/PSoC/ARM7/PowerPC embedded
cores now, why we can't dream of having devices based on a state of the
art and truly open platform (GPL) in the next years? And differently
from the other proprietary solutions, anyone can share ownership and
help in the development of OpenSPARC...

--
PabloBleyerKocik /"But what... is it good for?"
 pablo          / -- 1968 Engineer at IBM's Advanced Computing
  @bleyer.org  / Systems Division, commenting on the microchip

Weng Tianxiang wrote:
> Hi Pablo, > Thank you for your useful information. > > Weng
The problem is "System Requirements": "SPARC CPU based system"
Michael wrote:
> Weng Tianxiang wrote: > >>Hi Pablo, >>Thank you for your useful information. >> >>Weng > > > The problem is "System Requirements": "SPARC CPU based system" >
Is that for the software development environment?. Seems like the verilog rtl code should be pretty generic. From the description it sounds more like a big compute farm engine rather than something you would put in a fpga for an embedded system. John Eaton