> Out of curiousity: did you EVER have a GSRD implementation working on > the MiniModule? I actually emailed Xilinx a while ago asking if this > reference design would work on the MiniModule, and I was told that it > would not due to several technical reasons (that were all enumerated at > the time, and made sense to me, though I don't have them in front of me > right now). So, I'd be curious to hear if you had the original GSRD > working, and if you do in fact get the GSRD2 working. > > Regards, > John O. > www.jrobot.netHi John, You shocked me with your response. I have NEVER implemented an original GSRD to work on MiniModule. I actually did not find it necessary since I was waiting for GSRD2 (I tried to save some time). If there are some technical limits that prevent that I would like to see them written, because nobody told me yet, that this is not possible. I only had the original TEMAC reference design working (using LL_TEMAC in a CoreConnect style and lwip stack). With regrets, Guru
Problem to extend Xilinx GSRD Design
Started by ●June 29, 2006
Reply by ●July 1, 20062006-07-01
Reply by ●July 3, 20062006-07-03
Thanks for all that information! It seems to me to be a good solution to change to GSRD2. Has anybody experiences if the current downloadable version will work with the Montavista Linux Preview Kit 3.1. I managed it to run it on GSRD1 design. I can reach about 120 Mbits/s now. If i change to the new one i have to get it run there with the same performance. My second approach is to use the DCR-Bus in the GSRD1. There is a Interrupt contoller connected to the DCR and i would like to do it like the source from there. Is there a chance that this works in the end? What do you think? Eric Guru schrieb:>> Out of curiousity: did you EVER have a GSRD implementation working on >> the MiniModule? I actually emailed Xilinx a while ago asking if this >> reference design would work on the MiniModule, and I was told that it >> would not due to several technical reasons (that were all enumerated at >> the time, and made sense to me, though I don't have them in front of me >> right now). So, I'd be curious to hear if you had the original GSRD >> working, and if you do in fact get the GSRD2 working. >> >> Regards, >> John O. >> www.jrobot.net > > Hi John, > > You shocked me with your response. I have NEVER implemented an original > GSRD to work on MiniModule. I actually did not find it necessary since > I was waiting for GSRD2 (I tried to save some time). If there are some > technical limits that prevent that I would like to see them written, > because nobody told me yet, that this is not possible. I only had the > original TEMAC reference design working (using LL_TEMAC in a > CoreConnect style and lwip stack). > > With regrets, > > Guru >
Reply by ●July 4, 20062006-07-04
Hi Eric, Seems like MPMC2 implemented in GSRD2 opens unlimited possibilities to port the design to different platforms. I have downloaded the latest version of MPMC2 (20060630) which also includes GSRD2 and there is no sign of Linux - only Treck IP stack, this time with source code. Have you tested the performance of GRSD1 with Treck stack? What do you want to connect to DCR bus? I hope not for data transmission, because it is a low performance bus, primary for registers reading/writing. Send me a private email for further discussion/cooperation. Cheers, Guru





