I would like to contribute a multi-cycle (slow, but area-compact) (Hehe, someone else already released a pipelined integer-divider, to the opencores.org repository. Gence I'm marketing my divider as 'compact'!) I am reading through the FAQ, and one part has me a bit confused... === The 'licensing' portion -- I understand that the 'GPL' license is fairly restrictive in that it forces derivative works to be distributed in documented *AND* modifiable form. My goal is to let *anyone* use my integer-divider as they see fit. If they want to use it in a closed commercial project, that's fine. It seems like a GPL-release cannot be used in a closed project, is that correct? So under which license should I release my divider? LGPL, BSD, etc.?!? ... Also, is Xilinx Webpack 5.1ISE the final version that will run under Win98se (no flames please)? The newer versions refuse to install.
opencores.org - Question on project licensing?
Started by ●August 3, 2003
Reply by ●August 4, 20032003-08-04
"Pacbell User" <dont_reply@dont_reply.com> wrote in message news:<sSgXa.472$gC7.418@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>...> I would like to contribute a multi-cycle (slow, but area-compact) > (Hehe, someone else already released a pipelined integer-divider, > to the opencores.org repository. Gence I'm marketing my divider as'compact'!) > I am reading through the FAQ, and one part has me a bit confused...could I have a sneak preview of your divider ? (I want violate the license, whatever you will choose later) and you are right about licensing (that is confusing) GPL is what people think 'free' but in some way its more restrictive than commercial licenses. antti
Reply by ●August 4, 20032003-08-04
BSD licencense is popular, but the original had some problems see: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html So get a copy of the 'new' version or state it like suggested 'revised BSD license'. Martin -- -------------------------------------------------------- JOP - a Java Processor core for FPGAs now on Cyclone: http://www.jopdesign.com/cyclone/ "Pacbell User" <dont_reply@dont_reply.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:sSgXa.472$gC7.418@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...> I would like to contribute a multi-cycle (slow, but area-compact) > (Hehe, someone else already released a pipelined integer-divider, > to the opencores.org repository. Gence I'm marketing my divider as > 'compact'!) > I am reading through the FAQ, and one part has me a bit confused... > > === > > The 'licensing' portion -- I understand that the 'GPL' license > is fairly restrictive in that it forces derivative works to be > distributed in documented *AND* modifiable form. > > My goal is to let *anyone* use my integer-divider as they see > fit. If they want to use it in a closed commercial project, that's > fine. It seems like a GPL-release cannot be used in a closed > project, is that correct? > > So under which license should I release my divider? LGPL, BSD, etc.?!? > > ... > > Also, is Xilinx Webpack 5.1ISE the final version that will run > under Win98se (no flames please)? The newer versions refuse to install. > >
Reply by ●August 4, 20032003-08-04
Martin, Copyright? Copyleft? Hey, if I do an I-Q converter, can I use CopyOrthogonal? Rob (at 90 degrees to reality) Martin Schoeberl wrote:> > BSD licencense is popular, but the original had some problems see: > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html > So get a copy of the 'new' version or state it like suggested 'revised BSD > license'. > Martin > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------- > JOP - a Java Processor core for FPGAs now > on Cyclone: http://www.jopdesign.com/cyclone/ > > "Pacbell User" <dont_reply@dont_reply.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag > news:sSgXa.472$gC7.418@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com... > > I would like to contribute a multi-cycle (slow, but area-compact) > > (Hehe, someone else already released a pipelined integer-divider, > > to the opencores.org repository. Gence I'm marketing my divider as > > 'compact'!) > > I am reading through the FAQ, and one part has me a bit confused... > > > > === > > > > The 'licensing' portion -- I understand that the 'GPL' license > > is fairly restrictive in that it forces derivative works to be > > distributed in documented *AND* modifiable form. > > > > My goal is to let *anyone* use my integer-divider as they see > > fit. If they want to use it in a closed commercial project, that's > > fine. It seems like a GPL-release cannot be used in a closed > > project, is that correct? > > > > So under which license should I release my divider? LGPL, BSD, etc.?!? > > > > ... > > > > Also, is Xilinx Webpack 5.1ISE the final version that will run > > under Win98se (no flames please)? The newer versions refuse to install. > > > >
Reply by ●August 4, 20032003-08-04
Rob,> Copyright? Copyleft? Hey, if I do an I-Q converter, can I use > CopyOrthogonal?I didn't invent these words and I find them also strange ;-) Martin> > Rob (at 90 degrees to reality) > > > Martin Schoeberl wrote: > > > > BSD licencense is popular, but the original had some problems see: > > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html > > So get a copy of the 'new' version or state it like suggested 'revisedBSD> > license'. > > Martin > > > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > JOP - a Java Processor core for FPGAs now > > on Cyclone: http://www.jopdesign.com/cyclone/ > > > > "Pacbell User" <dont_reply@dont_reply.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag > > news:sSgXa.472$gC7.418@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com... > > > I would like to contribute a multi-cycle (slow, but area-compact) > > > (Hehe, someone else already released a pipelined integer-divider, > > > to the opencores.org repository. Gence I'm marketing my divider as > > > 'compact'!) > > > I am reading through the FAQ, and one part has me a bit confused... > > > > > > === > > > > > > The 'licensing' portion -- I understand that the 'GPL' license > > > is fairly restrictive in that it forces derivative works to be > > > distributed in documented *AND* modifiable form. > > > > > > My goal is to let *anyone* use my integer-divider as they see > > > fit. If they want to use it in a closed commercial project, that's > > > fine. It seems like a GPL-release cannot be used in a closed > > > project, is that correct? > > > > > > So under which license should I release my divider? LGPL, BSD, etc.?!? > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Also, is Xilinx Webpack 5.1ISE the final version that will run > > > under Win98se (no flames please)? The newer versions refuse toinstall.> > > > > >
Reply by ●August 4, 20032003-08-04
"Pacbell User" <dont_reply@dont_reply.com> wrote in message news:<sSgXa.472$gC7.418@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>...> I would like to contribute a multi-cycle (slow, but area-compact) > (Hehe, someone else already released a pipelined integer-divider, > to the opencores.org repository. Gence I'm marketing my divider as > 'compact'!) > I am reading through the FAQ, and one part has me a bit confused... > > === > > The 'licensing' portion -- I understand that the 'GPL' license > is fairly restrictive in that it forces derivative works to be > distributed in documented *AND* modifiable form. > > My goal is to let *anyone* use my integer-divider as they see > fit. If they want to use it in a closed commercial project, that's > fine. It seems like a GPL-release cannot be used in a closed > project, is that correct? > > So under which license should I release my divider? LGPL, BSD, etc.?!?Look at some other IP cores (perhaps some of mine) at OpenCores. I faced the same problem that you are facing, I wanted to protect myself but not limit the usage of any of my IP cores. So I created my own "license". It's on top of each of my files ... Best Regards, rudi -------------------------------------------------------- www.asics.ws --- Solutions for your ASIC/FPGA needs --- ----------------- FPGAs * Full Custom ICs * IP Cores --- FREE IP Cores --> http://www.asics.ws/ <-- FREE IP Cores
Reply by ●August 4, 20032003-08-04
Pacbell User wrote:> The 'licensing' portion -- I understand that the 'GPL' license > is fairly restrictive in that it forces derivative works to be > distributed in documented *AND* modifiable form.LGPL will not really help you here and I am not really sure how you would apply it to a hardware design in any case. Can you LGPL license hardware designs and treat the situation is if you were linking against a library thus being ok with binary distribution? Does that really work? I personally prefer the GPL over most other licenses however in this case either having no license or a BSD style one will probably suffice. Jon.
