Hai, What is the cutoff frequency range setted for communication and multimedia application??And which is the optimal FIR filter design method suited for that?? regards, faz
cutoff frequency
Started by ●May 31, 2008
Reply by ●May 31, 20082008-05-31
"fazulu deen" <fazulu.vlsi@gmail.com> wrote in message news:04f3b99d-e815-4d7e-b9ea-9cc1a2fc6795@l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...> Hai, > > What is the cutoff frequency range setted for communication and > multimedia application??Between 0.00001 Hz or less and 100GHz or greater depending on the application>And which is the optimal FIR filter design > method suited for that?? >Variable ratio multitap with adaptive confocal formalized feedback
Reply by ●May 31, 20082008-05-31
On Sat, 31 May 2008 09:48:17 +0100, "Icky Thwacket" wrote:>>And which is the optimal FIR filter design >> method suited for that?? > >Variable ratio multitap with adaptive confocal formalized feedbackReally? In fairness to the OP we ought to mention the possibility of polyglobular phase-incontrovertible Tchebyshev locus diagrams. I find them invaluable for completing my sub-fusc harmonic variance charts for phase-denibulized channels. -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd., 22 Market Place, Ringwood, BH24 1AW, UK jonathan.bromley@MYCOMPANY.com http://www.MYCOMPANY.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.
Reply by ●May 31, 20082008-05-31
Hai, Between 0.00001 Hz or less and 100GHz or greater depending on the application Can i say the cutoff frequency range can fall anywhere inbetween 0.0001hz to 100Ghz for communication and multimedia application..?? Variable ratio multitap with adaptive confocal formalized feedback can u suggest among the following which is the optimal filter design method for the above applications.. 1.equiripple 2.window 3.constant least squares 4.complex equiripple 5.interpolated FIR regards, faz On May 31, 3:05=A0pm, Jonathan Bromley <jonathan.brom...@MYCOMPANY.com> wrote:> On Sat, 31 May 2008 09:48:17 +0100, "Icky Thwacket" wrote: > >>And which is the optimal FIR filter design > >> method suited for that?? > > >Variable ratio multitap with adaptive confocal formalized feedback > > Really? =A0In fairness to the OP we ought to mention the > possibility of polyglobular phase-incontrovertible > Tchebyshev locus diagrams. =A0I find them invaluable for > completing my sub-fusc harmonic variance charts for > phase-denibulized channels. > -- > Jonathan Bromley, Consultant > > DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how > VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services > > Doulos Ltd., 22 Market Place, Ringwood, BH24 1AW, UK > jonathan.brom...@MYCOMPANY.comhttp://www.MYCOMPANY.com > > The contents of this message may contain personal views which > are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.
Reply by ●May 31, 20082008-05-31
"fazulu deen" <fazulu.vlsi@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8a769af7-bae0-4b22-b2fa-5eab42bc1a26@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com... Hai,>Between 0.00001 Hz or less and 100GHz or greater depending on the >application>Can i say the cutoff frequency range can fall anywhere inbetween >0.0001hz to 100Ghz for communication and multimedia application..??Yes probably>Variable ratio multitap with adaptive confocal formalized feedback>can u suggest among the following which is the optimal filter design >method for the above applications.. >1.equiripple >2.window >3.constant least squares >4.complex equiripple >5.interpolated FIROver the frequency range in question, probably a generalized mix of all of them.
Reply by ●May 31, 20082008-05-31
"Jonathan Bromley" <jonathan.bromley@MYCOMPANY.com> wrote in message news:ra8244hivnivfr1cas3spthtolgnts05v2@4ax.com...> On Sat, 31 May 2008 09:48:17 +0100, "Icky Thwacket" wrote: > >>>And which is the optimal FIR filter design >>> method suited for that?? >> >>Variable ratio multitap with adaptive confocal formalized feedback > > Really? In fairness to the OP we ought to mention the > possibility of polyglobular phase-incontrovertible > Tchebyshev locus diagrams. I find them invaluable for > completing my sub-fusc harmonic variance charts for > phase-denibulized channels. > --Yes you are right - forgot about that one - thanks for reminding me. -- although I don't think they are quite as accurate in the sub Hz range due to non convergence of the cyclohelical semidisquashed hydronoid reciprocity function.
Reply by ●May 31, 20082008-05-31
Icky Thwacket wrote:>>Can i say the cutoff frequency range can fall anywhere inbetween >>0.0001hz to 100Ghz for communication and multimedia application..?? > > Yes probablyBut a 100GHz cutoff frequency is required only to avoid quantum matter aliasing with high resolution graviton lenses and holoemitters. -- Frank Buss, fb@frank-buss.de http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.it4-systems.de
Reply by ●May 31, 20082008-05-31
Hai, Can i say the cutoff frequency range can fall anywhere inbetween 0.0001hz to 100Ghz for communication and multimedia application..?? Yes probably Do u mean to say that for communication and multimedia application i can design a FIR low pass or High pass or band pass or band reject filter with cutoff frequency fall anywhere inbetween 0.0001hz to 100Ghz?which means can i select cutoff frequencies of FIR LP.HP,BP,BR filters in this range?? regards, faz On May 31, 6:04=A0pm, Frank Buss <f...@frank-buss.de> wrote:> Icky Thwacket wrote: > >>Can i say the cutoff frequency range can fall anywhere inbetween > >>0.0001hz to 100Ghz for communication and multimedia application..?? > > > Yes probably > > But a 100GHz cutoff frequency is required only to avoid quantum matter > aliasing with high resolution graviton lenses and holoemitters. > > -- > Frank Buss, f...@frank-buss.dehttp://www.frank-buss.de,http://www.it4-syst=ems.de
Reply by ●May 31, 20082008-05-31
fazulu deen wrote:> Do u mean to say that for communication and multimedia application i > can design a FIR low pass or High pass or band pass or band reject > filter with cutoff frequency fall anywhere inbetween 0.0001hz to > 100Ghz?which means can i select cutoff frequencies of FIR LP.HP,BP,BR > filters in this range??As Icky Thwacket wrote, probably yes. Ok, at the risk of spoil the party: Of course, before writing this as an answer for your homework exercise, you should think a bit (or trying Google and Wikipedia) about the frequencies of audio and video, the usage for filters and what are the reproducer limits, like speakers. -- Frank Buss, fb@frank-buss.de http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.it4-systems.de
Reply by ●May 31, 20082008-05-31
"fazulu deen" <fazulu.vlsi@gmail.com> wrote in message news:795cb9ce-b5b6-4659-9c8e-dc4cb1b27b1b@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com... Hai,> Do u mean to say that for communication and multimedia application i > can design a FIR low pass or High pass or band pass or band reject > filter with cutoff frequency fall anywhere inbetween 0.0001hz to > 100Ghz?I highly doubt it. KJ
