FPGARelated.com
Forums

Connecting a crystal to a Cyclone or Max PLD

Started by David Brown May 1, 2004
Peter Alfke wrote:

> Every xtal has parallel as well as series resonance. These two frequencies > are very close together, and the typical Colpitts oscillator actually > oscillates at a frequency in-between. > For most typical low-precision applications, the difference between parallel > and series resonance is irrelevant for the user. The crystal just picks a > point in-between.
Maybe not close enough if you are building a clock or frequency counter, but probably close enough for a CPU clock, I agree. I agree that the frequencies are close. Different oscillator circuits work differently, and I wasn't sure which your description was about. Also, some crystals are designed to run at a higher odd harmonic of the fundamental, which complicates things a little. I once knew the difference between the two types of oscillators, but I don't remember it now. -- glen
For a basic tutorial, on xtal oscillators, see

http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/appnote_number/1017/ln/en

Peter Alfke

> From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> > Organization: Comcast Online > Newsgroups: comp.arch.fpga > Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 00:38:34 GMT > Subject: Re: Connecting a crystal to a Cyclone or Max PLD > > Peter Alfke wrote: > >> Every xtal has parallel as well as series resonance. These two frequencies >> are very close together, and the typical Colpitts oscillator actually >> oscillates at a frequency in-between. >> For most typical low-precision applications, the difference between parallel >> and series resonance is irrelevant for the user. The crystal just picks a >> point in-between. > > Maybe not close enough if you are building a clock or frequency > counter, but probably close enough for a CPU clock, I agree. > > I agree that the frequencies are close. Different oscillator circuits > work differently, and I wasn't sure which your description was about. > > Also, some crystals are designed to run at a higher odd harmonic of > the fundamental, which complicates things a little. > > I once knew the difference between the two types of oscillators, but > I don't remember it now. > > -- glen >