I'm looking for a FPGA OEM module for analog signal processing which contains the following: - medium size spartan 3 or spartan 6 FPGA - 2 ADCs, sampling rate > 50 MHz, at least 14 (better 16) bit resolution - 2 DACs, sampling rate > 50 MHz, 16 bit resolution - plus quite some digital I/O lines - on-board memory would be a plus, but it is not required Does such a board exist in the price range up to 500 USD? Thanks, Thomas
Looking for a FPGA board
Started by ●July 13, 2011
Reply by ●July 13, 20112011-07-13
>I'm looking for a FPGA OEM module for analog signal processing.. Analog(ue) signal process normally involves a lot of Op Amps from which filters, multipliers, differentiators, integrators and similar can be constructed. No ADCs or DACs. If you want to do digital signal processing, an FPGA with a lot of MAC blocks (such as the DSP48 in Xilinx FPGAs) is what you will need. --------------------------------------- Posted through http://www.FPGARelated.com
Reply by ●July 13, 20112011-07-13
Am 13.07.2011 08:50, schrieb Thomas Heller:> I'm looking for a FPGA OEM module for analog signal processing > which contains the following: > > - medium size spartan 3 or spartan 6 FPGA > - 2 ADCs, sampling rate > 50 MHz, at least 14 (better 16) bit resolution > - 2 DACs, sampling rate > 50 MHz, 16 bit resolution > - plus quite some digital I/O lines > - on-board memory would be a plus, but it is not required > > Does such a board exist in the price range up to 500 USD?> Am 13.07.2011 11:44, schrieb RCIngham: >> Analog(ue) signal process normally involves a lot of Op Amps from which >> filters, multipliers, differentiators, integrators and similar can be >> constructed. No ADCs or DACs. >> >> If you want to do digital signal processing, an FPGA with a lot of MAC >> blocks (such as the DSP48 in Xilinx FPGAs) is what you will need.Of course I meant digital signal processing ;-). That is the point of the ADCs and DACs connected to the FPGA.
Reply by ●July 13, 20112011-07-13
If it's a one off then probably not. But of it is anything more e.g. for an OEM manufacturing cycle we might be able to do something. We are working on a few things like this. John Adair Enterpoint Ltd. On Jul 13, 7:50=A0am, Thomas Heller <thel...@ctypes.org> wrote:> I'm looking for a FPGA OEM module for analog signal processing > which contains the following: > > - medium size spartan 3 or spartan 6 FPGA > - 2 ADCs, sampling rate > 50 MHz, at least 14 (better 16) bit resolution > - 2 DACs, sampling rate > 50 MHz, 16 bit resolution > - plus quite some digital I/O lines > - on-board memory would be a plus, but it is not required > > Does such a board exist in the price range up to 500 USD? > > Thanks, > Thomas
Reply by ●July 13, 20112011-07-13
On 07/12/2011 11:50 PM, Thomas Heller wrote:> I'm looking for a FPGA OEM module for analog signal processing > which contains the following: > > - medium size spartan 3 or spartan 6 FPGA > - 2 ADCs, sampling rate > 50 MHz, at least 14 (better 16) bit resolution > - 2 DACs, sampling rate > 50 MHz, 16 bit resolution > - plus quite some digital I/O lines > - on-board memory would be a plus, but it is not required > > Does such a board exist in the price range up to 500 USD?_Dig_ through Xilinx's and Avnet's web pages. The last time I did real FPGA design Xilinx pointed you to Avnet for a Spartan 6 board, and that board had a dock for a daughter card, and Avnet had a _bazillion_ daughter cards. A daughter card with ADC and DAC would be a no-brainer. At the speeds you're looking for, you should probably stick the keyword "video" into your search terms, look carefully at the data conversion hardware to make sure it isn't specific to some video mode, and make sure you're sitting down when you look at the price. Here: this only misses your target price by a factor of 8: http://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/AES-V6DSP-LX240T-G.htm. This one is well within your price range, but I didn't look to see how fast the data conversion is: http://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/HW-SPAR3A-SK-UNI-G.htm You get the idea. Good luck. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Do you need to implement control loops in software? "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" was written for you. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
Reply by ●July 13, 20112011-07-13
On 13 Jul., 11:44, "RCIngham" <robert.ingham@n_o_s_p_a_m.n_o_s_p_a_m.gmail.com> wrote:> Analog(ue) signal process normally involves a lot of Op Amps from which > filters, multipliers, differentiators, integrators and similar can be > constructed. No ADCs or DACs.This is an ambiguity in english language. Analog signal processing could be: a) analog processing of a signal b) processing of an analog signal b) can be performed by digitization followed by digital processing The standard example of this language construct is the "german prisoner of war camp", where you can't tell whether the prisoners or the guards are german. Kolja
Reply by ●July 13, 20112011-07-13
You would probably be best just to buy a card with an FMC connector and develop your own daughter board. Jon --------------------------------------- Posted through http://www.FPGARelated.com
Reply by ●July 14, 20112011-07-14
> - medium size spartan 3 or spartan 6 FPGA > - 2 ADCs, sampling rate > 50 MHz, at least 14 (better 16) bit resolution > - 2 DACs, sampling rate > 50 MHz, 16 bit resolution > - plus quite some digital I/O lines > - on-board memory would be a plus, but it is not requiredCheck terasic: http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?Language=English&CategoryNo=73&No=278&PartNo=1 or http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?Language=English&CategoryNo=73&No=360&PartNo=1 then any development kit which You like and can afford from Altera, which has HSMC connector.
Reply by ●July 14, 20112011-07-14
Kolja Sulimma <ksulimma@googlemail.com> wrote:>On 13 Jul., 11:44, "RCIngham" ><robert.ingham@n_o_s_p_a_m.n_o_s_p_a_m.gmail.com> wrote: > >> Analog(ue) signal process normally involves a lot of Op Amps from which >> filters, multipliers, differentiators, integrators and similar can be >> constructed. No ADCs or DACs. > >This is an ambiguity in english language. Analog signal processing >could be: >a) analog processing of a signal >b) processing of an analog signal > >b) can be performed by digitization followed by digital processing > >The standard example of this language construct is the "german >prisoner of war camp", >where you can't tell whether the prisoners or the guards are german.Which is why they invented context. -- Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply indicates you are not using the right tools... nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.) --------------------------------------------------------------
Reply by ●July 14, 20112011-07-14






