Dne sobota, 06. maj 2017 08.32.09 UTC+2 je oseba rickman napisala:
> Are you a customer that shows up on their radar?
No.
Reply by rickman●May 6, 20172017-05-06
On 5/6/2017 2:05 AM, Brane2 wrote:
> Dne sobota, 06. maj 2017 03.37.48 UTC+2 je oseba rickman napisala:
>> On 5/3/2017 3:04 PM, Brane2 wrote:
>>> AFAIK ECP5 is good for interfacing with DDR3, but not DDR4.
>>>
>>> Is there a plan to introduce new members with DDR4 or perhaps new family with such interface ?
>>
>> I expect Lattice has many plans. Best to ask them, no? Do you have an
>> email for your Lattice sales person or FAE?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Rick C
>
> I did. They haven't even responded.
Are you a customer that shows up on their radar?
--
Rick C
Reply by Brane2●May 6, 20172017-05-06
Dne sobota, 06. maj 2017 03.37.48 UTC+2 je oseba rickman napisala:
> On 5/3/2017 3:04 PM, Brane2 wrote:
> > AFAIK ECP5 is good for interfacing with DDR3, but not DDR4.
> >
> > Is there a plan to introduce new members with DDR4 or perhaps new family with such interface ?
>
> I expect Lattice has many plans. Best to ask them, no? Do you have an
> email for your Lattice sales person or FAE?
>
> --
>
> Rick C
I did. They haven't even responded.
Reply by rickman●May 5, 20172017-05-05
On 5/3/2017 3:04 PM, Brane2 wrote:
> AFAIK ECP5 is good for interfacing with DDR3, but not DDR4.
>
> Is there a plan to introduce new members with DDR4 or perhaps new family with such interface ?
I expect Lattice has many plans. Best to ask them, no? Do you have an
email for your Lattice sales person or FAE?
--
Rick C
Reply by Brane2●May 3, 20172017-05-03
AFAIK ECP5 is good for interfacing with DDR3, but not DDR4.
Is there a plan to introduce new members with DDR4 or perhaps new family with such interface ?