Virtually /all/ Biblical quotations you post, Rick C. H., are taken out
of context. You have picked up many of the words and sentences in the
Bible, but missed out on the real messages and concepts. You would do
well to listen to people like Rick "gnuarm" - he has a much better
understanding of the Bible, Christianity, and the messages therein than
you do. /I/ have a much better understanding than you do - and I am
don't believe in anything supernatural.
You are determined to take every word you read in the Bible "literally"
- yet you dismiss the post of Rick "gnuarm" as being "out of context".
Do you have the slightest clue as to where those words in your book came
from? If you knew the history - the history of the people who wrote it,
the cultures, and how the stories and lessons have passed down to us
through time, distance, translation, transcription, interpretations and
selections, you would realise how utterly absurd your attitude is. The
Bible is a marvellous piece of work, and contains a great deal of useful
teaching and philosophy - for Christians and atheists alike. But you
have to understand it for what it is, and that is /not/ a magical book
with spells that you can quote at semi-random to justify your ego,
arrogance, hatred, and appalling bigotry, nor will those "spells"
magically convert others to your followers. It /will/ teach you about
your god, and will give guidance to how to be a better person, and it
will help you get a closer relationship to Jesus. But you have to read
it sensibly and appropriately. You have to apply the greatest gift god
gave us humans - your rational mind.
And yes, I know you will dismiss any criticism or corrections as being
inspired by the devil, or a daemon, or whatever you think posses my body
at the moment. The fact that you are unwilling to think properly, and
discuss rationally, shows that you are either a brainwashed fanatic, or
have serious psychological issues. (Based on your posting patterns over
the years, and my own experience with people with such problems, I
suspect the later. Help is available, but you have to want it - or the
people close to you have to insist upon it.)
Reply by ●January 16, 20192019-01-16
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 11:03:23 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 9:33:37 PM UTC-5, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 8:38:43 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 7:21:56 PM UTC-5, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Your arrogance is in thinking you have told me anything I don't already know. I've shown you how you have missed the mark on everything you think about me and you are only really concerned with your own ego. So you retreat to spouting scripture. Verily, you keep getting it all wrong.
> > >
> > > Christians examine the fruit they see, Rick. Your fruit bears out
> > > a particular way.
> >
> > As I said, judging as the word tells us not to do.
> >
> > " “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?"
> >
> > "Therefore you have no excuse, O man, every one of you who judges. For in passing judgment on another you condemn yourself"
> >
> > As always, you are pious to a fault.
>
> That verse is often taken out of context.
>
> In it, Jesus is teaching people not to be hypocrites. If I judge
> someone as being a liar, I had better not yet already be a liar
> also or else I condemn myself with my judgment of others. But,
> if I am not a liar, then I am able to judge someone else as being
> a liar rightly because I am walking as I should.
>
> And the same type of relationship to ourselves first, then to others,
> applies out to all things in this context. It's Jesus telling those
> who are believers to not be hypocrites, and to judge righteous judg-
> ment upon others, not by mere appearances (both inwardly unto self,
> and outwardly unto others).
You so completely fail to understand... to paraphrase your own words, "woosh"!
You are making judgement of others when it is not your place to do so. Then you twist the scripture to justify your actions when the Word is telling you exactly to not do what you doing.
You are such a perfect example of what Christians should never try to be, holier than thou. Instead you should try to learn of your own shortcomings.
Clearly this conversation will never bear fruit. You see yourself as the savior of everyone else in the world. So be it. Save us. Just don't ask us for help with electronics until you can see that we are not what you think we are.
Rick C.
+-+ Get 6 months of free supercharging
+-+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Reply by ●January 15, 20192019-01-15
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 8:38:43 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 7:21:56 PM UTC-5, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Your arrogance is in thinking you have told me anything I don't already know. I've shown you how you have missed the mark on everything you think about me and you are only really concerned with your own ego. So you retreat to spouting scripture. Verily, you keep getting it all wrong.
>
> Christians examine the fruit they see, Rick. Your fruit bears out
> a particular way.
As I said, judging as the word tells us not to do.
" “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?"
"Therefore you have no excuse, O man, every one of you who judges. For in passing judgment on another you condemn yourself"
As always, you are pious to a fault.
Rick C.
+-- Get 6 months of free supercharging
+-- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Reply by ●January 15, 20192019-01-15
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 2:49:27 PM UTC-5, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 2:43:23 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > > No, sir. We are called to teach people where they are, and what
> > > it means.
> > >
> > > https://tinyurl.com/ybrnwljs
> >
> > I didn't say "teach". I said "judge". You are clearly judging
> > people when you refer to "those who will perish" and "those who
> > will be saved".
>
> Those are things taught by God in the Bible. I repeat His words.
> All who do not come to Jesus Christ area already dead in their sin.
> All who come to Him in humble repentance asking forgiveness are
> saved.
>
> You've heard of John 3:16? Have you ever read further?
>
> https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+3%3A18&version=KJV
>
> John 3:18 -- He that believeth on [Jesus] is not condemned: but
> he that believeth not is condemned already, because
> he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten
> Son of God.
>
> Christians do not judge. We teach people of the things God has said
> already He would judge. We teach these things because you own't hear
> them from the world. The world says you're fine. The world wants
> you to never give a thought to eternity, to your soul, to judgment.
> The world is perishing, and all who cling to the world will perish
> likewise. But Jesus came to offer us new life. It is there, when we
> come to Him, that our sin is forgiven, and our judgment is taken away:
>
> https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+5%3A24&version=KJV
>
> 24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word,
> and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life,
> and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from
> death unto life.
>
> It says "is passed" (present tense, meaning the born again spirit
> nature -- See John 3 for information on the spirit nature):
>
> https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+3&version=KJV
>
> > All your posts here are about putting yourself above others on this planet... as if we were not someone that God loves and who love God. You know nothing about us. You only know your own feelings and respond this way not out of love for anyone else, but because you find yourself lost and don't understand what anyone is saying to you.
>
> I place myself below everyone, because as I teach these things I
> know there will be backlash, hatred, foul language, false accusa-
> tions, all depending on the individual, but all directed at me be-
> cause I bear the message.
>
> I am teaching you what God commanded me to teach so that you would
> not come into condemnation, but would instead ask forgiveness and
> be saved, for it is God's will that none should perish, but that
> all should come to repentance:
>
> https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Peter+3%3A8-10&version=KJV
>
> 9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men
> count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing
> that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
>
> He's patient with us, but there is coming a final day when His
> patience ends, and His wrath begins against all the ungodly who
> have rejected Him repeatedly throughout their lives.
>
> --
> Rick C. Hodgin
Your arrogance is in thinking you have told me anything I don't already know. I've shown you how you have missed the mark on everything you think about me and you are only really concerned with your own ego. So you retreat to spouting scripture. Verily, you keep getting it all wrong.
Rick C.
-++ Get 6 months of free supercharging
-++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Reply by Weng Tianxiang●January 15, 20192019-01-15
Hi,
Kevin Neilson's suggestion leads to a very good paper on the subject:
http://ece.ubc.ca/~ameer/publications/Abdelhadi-Journal-2015Jul-TRETSCode2014-SwitchedMultiportedRAM.pdf
"Modular Switched Multi-ported SRAM-based Memories"
"In this paper, to reduce this area overhead, two methods of constructing SRAM-based LVTs are described. The methodology of constructing SRAM-based LVTs is also generalized. To the authors’ best knowledge this is the first attempt to build an LVT out of SRAM blocks only"
The paper provides a lot of schematic diagrams which make reading much easier and faster for understanding the paper's essence.
Weng
Reply by Weng Tianxiang●January 15, 20192019-01-15
> My point is ... be nice and respectful of people, even if you think
> they are not what they should be in terms of knowledge or ability.
>
> --
> Rick C. Hodgin
Hi Rick C. Hodgin,
1. I am standing for your opinion: be nice and respectful of people!
2. And I appreciate your 3 excellent references very much.
By your 3 references I think everyone who read this post really learned from you and fully understands the solution to my post.
Thank you.
Weng
Reply by ●January 15, 20192019-01-15
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 2:43:23 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 2:21:34 PM UTC-5, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> > ... The simple fact that you judge me shows you feel you are a
> > "better" person than I am.
>
> No, sir. We are called to teach people where they are, and what
> it means.
>
> https://tinyurl.com/ybrnwljs
I didn't say "teach". I said "judge". You are clearly judging people when you refer to "those who will perish" and "those who will be saved".
All your posts here are about putting yourself above others on this planet... as if we were not someone that God loves and who love God. You know nothing about us. You only know your own feelings and respond this way not out of love for anyone else, but because you find yourself lost and don't understand what anyone is saying to you.
Rick C.
-+- Get 6 months of free supercharging
-+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Reply by ●January 15, 20192019-01-15
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 1:47:54 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 12:58:27 PM UTC-5, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 12:04:28 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 11:29:49 AM UTC-5, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 7:58:15 AM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > > > > That was the sound of my point in the prior post flying right past you.
> > > >
> > > > [snip]
> > >
> > > My point is ... be nice and respectful of people, even if you think
> > > they are not what they should be in terms of knowledge or ability.
> >
> > Yes, you might take your own advice. That is the thing about you Hodgin's. You sincerely believe you are holier than thou.
>
> NO!!! I do not, sir. I put in effort to serve God rightly, and
> I am proud of my efforts toward that end, but I am not holier-
> than-thou. I am a sinner in need of forgiveness just like every
> other person on this Earth.
>
> >Try looking at the world through other people's glasses and you will see that you yourself are the troll here.
>
> I recognize how I am seen. But this message does not go forth
> for those who will perish. It goes forth for those who will be
> saved.
>
> The light of the world, Jesus Christ, has come into the world to
> give us the way out of our sin.
>
> That is what I teach. I teach the way YOU CAN HAVE
> *******ETERNAL********LIFE*******!!! It's not for personal gain
> for me or my family, or for a church I belong to. I'm teaching
> how YOU can have your sin forgiven, and you can be in paradise
> with God after you leave this world. Paradise, Rick.
>
> > Just consider the purpose of your first post in this thread. Clearly it wasn't for the benefit of anyone else. Tell us what benefit you hoped to gain by it?
>
> It was to try and grab hold of you by the ears, and rattle your
> thinking into shape, so you'd realize your comments toward Weng
> Tianxiang were inappropriate, and that you have a biting tongue
> always causing pain under the guise of providing help.
>
> > If you could just lose the pious attitude you might be able to learn something here.
>
> If you could remove the blinders from your eyes, you'd see what
> Jesus Christ can offer you. You only see through worldly eyes,
> Rick, and you will not see anything else.
>
> There is more. And it is that more that is FAR MORE important than
> what you see today. Please ... seek the truth in these words, and
> don't just conclude that I'm something like holier-than-thou. I am
> trying to lead you to the most desirable end for your life, be that
> in 1 hour, or 80 years.
>
> Regardless of your assessment summary of me today, someday you will
> know the truth, and that truth will own the day. I am not what you
> think I am, and I am sincere in desiring to reach out to you and
> the others here so they too can be saved.
>
> --
> Rick C. Hodgin
This is exactly what I am talking about. The simple fact that you judge me shows you feel you are a "better" person than I am. The fact that you accept that you are a sinner is not the issue. You believe you are better than the other sinners and you know the one true way. It is not about saving anyone. It is about your ego, that you are the person who will save others. Arrogance!
I sincerely believe you will never understand this or much about electronics. In both cases the only problem is that you shut out the truth, the true word.
Rick C.
--+ Get 6 months of free supercharging
--+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Reply by ●January 15, 20192019-01-15
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 12:04:28 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 11:29:49 AM UTC-5, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 7:58:15 AM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > > That was the sound of my point in the prior post flying right past you.
> >
> > [snip]
>
> My point is ... be nice and respectful of people, even if you think
> they are not what they should be in terms of knowledge or ability.
Yes, you might take your own advice. That is the thing about you Hodgin's. You sincerely believe you are holier than thou. Try looking at the world through other people's glasses and you will see that you yourself are the troll here.
Just consider the purpose of your first post in this thread. Clearly it wasn't for the benefit of anyone else. Tell us what benefit you hoped to gain by it?
If you could just lose the pious attitude you might be able to learn something here.
Rick C.
--- Get 6 months of free supercharging
--- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Reply by Kevin Neilson●January 15, 20192019-01-15
On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 5:11:48 PM UTC-7, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 6:38:35 PM UTC-5, Rob Gaddi wrote:
> > On 1/14/19 1:22 PM, HT-Lab wrote:
> > > On 14/01/2019 19:54, Weng Tianxiang wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I cannot understand the following paper:
> > >> "Efficient Multi-Ported Memories for FPGAs"
> > >>
> > >> http://www.eecg.toronto.edu/~steffan/papers/laforest_fpga10.pdf
> > >>
> > >> FPGA has a structure with 1 write port and 2 read port memory block: 2
> > >> memory blocks sharing the same write port and each of 2 blocks can be
> > >> read individually by 2 different read.
> > >>
> > >> The paper essence for 2 write ports and 2 read ports is:
> > >> There are 2 memory blocks each having 1 write port and 2 read ports.
> > >>
> > >> The 2 memory blocks provide 2 write ports to write independently.
> > >>
> > >> There is another memory block, called LVT (Live Value Table), with 2
> > >> write ports and 2 read ports, each cell of which stores the port
> > >> number which holds the latest write data.
> > >>
> > >> Example:
> > >>
> > >> simultaneously:
> > >> Write through port 1 with address 3; --- no problem
> > >>
> > >> Write through port 0 with address 2;
> > >>
> > >> simultaneously:
> > >> 0 --> LVT(2);
> > >> 1 --> LVT(3); --- how can it write 2 cells of a memory at the same cycle?
> > >>
> > >> If above 2 simultaneously write operation are feasible, 2 read
> > >> operations can read from LVT first to get proper port number, and then
> > >> get the correct latest data read from the port number.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you.
> > >>
> > >> Weng
> > >>
> > >
> > > Hi Weng,
> > >
> > > It is quite a simple scheme, assume you have 2 write ports each writing
> > > into their own blockram. If port0 write to address 0x12 and port1 writes
> > > to address 0x15 then the LVT (single bit array in this case) will store
> > > array[12]=0 and array[15]=1.
> > > Then if a read port read from address 15 the LVT array will set the mux
> > > to 1 which connect the second blockram to the output.
> > >
> > > I use the XOR variant in my processor for a 8w8r block.
> > >
> > > Good luck,
> > > Hans
> > > www.ht-lab.com
> > >
> >
> > Although the kicker with this paper is in simultaneous reads. They
> > gloss pretty hard over the fact that (per the end of 5.3 and 5.4), for N
> > write ports and M read ports, you need N*M redundant BRAMs. For their
> > example of a 4-write, 8-read RAM they're using 32-fold the actual RAM
> > requirements. Can't even take advantage of BRAM packing, since they use
> > both ports of each RAM to keep one dedicated write port and one
> > dedicated read. 32x is a hell of a multiplier to be fighting against;
> > it'll chew up all the RAM in a cheap FPGA before you can bat an eye.
>
> I'm not sure what your point is. That is the nature of multiport memories. If you need it, you need it. They can be the performance limiting portion of a design and so they would be very welcome at nearly any cost.
>
> I seem to recall when Xilinx block rams had true quad port capability in that they could read and write from two ports all at the same time. There may have only been two address buses, I can't recall. But the two write ports could operate simultaneously. The only limitation was both ports could not write to the same address.
>
> Rick C.
>
> -- Get 6 months of free supercharging
> -- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
You could consider the Xilinx BRAMs true quad port, if you set both ports to READ_FIRST, with the limitation that there are only 2 address buses and you have to read from the same address to which you are writing. Most of the time you want to read from some address other than the one to which you are writing.
When I was trying to make a true quad port (4 addresses) I found a Xilinx app note (XAPP228) on making a BRAM-based quad port. I was excited I wouldn't have to design one from scratch. I opened the app note and saw it described how to double the clock and use timeslicing to make extra virtual ports. Thanks, Xilinx! Like I needed an app note for that. No problem; I'll just double my 350MHz clock to 700MHz.