On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 02:14:31 +0000, "Tim (one of many)"
<tim@nooospam.roockyloogic.com> wrote:
>leevv wrote:
>
>> I found that 9.1 is much more stable then 9.2. So I'm skiping 9.2
>> completely and wait for 10.1 which is comming , I guess, in March.
>
>9.2 P&R is sooooo much faster with big jobs.
Yeah... after 30sec the (self-terminated) job is done. LOL
Reply by Tim (one of many)●February 22, 20082008-02-22
leevv wrote:
> I found that 9.1 is much more stable then 9.2. So I'm skiping 9.2
> completely and wait for 10.1 which is comming , I guess, in March.
9.2 P&R is sooooo much faster with big jobs.
Reply by leevv●February 22, 20082008-02-22
Ah, it just Xilinx tools self terminates, not Xilinx. I was
scared. ;-)
I found that 9.1 is much more stable then 9.2. So I'm skiping 9.2
completely and wait for 10.1 which is comming , I guess, in March.
Reply by Antti●February 22, 20082008-02-22
Hi
any info on ISE 10.1 ?
maybe, HOPE really, Xilinx has done something to improve their
software quality.
It should be possible to write the GUI that doesnt self-terminate
itself so often.
I am trying to playback an SVF file, and it caused impact and ISE self-
termination.
there are possibilites to "CATCH" exceptions and recover the
application, but no,
Xilinx tools just terminate themself.
Antti