Reply by February 26, 20082008-02-26
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 02:14:31 +0000, "Tim (one of many)"
<tim@nooospam.roockyloogic.com> wrote:

>leevv wrote: > >> I found that 9.1 is much more stable then 9.2. So I'm skiping 9.2 >> completely and wait for 10.1 which is comming , I guess, in March. > >9.2 P&R is sooooo much faster with big jobs.
Yeah... after 30sec the (self-terminated) job is done. LOL
Reply by Tim (one of many) February 22, 20082008-02-22
leevv wrote:

> I found that 9.1 is much more stable then 9.2. So I'm skiping 9.2 > completely and wait for 10.1 which is comming , I guess, in March.
9.2 P&R is sooooo much faster with big jobs.
Reply by leevv February 22, 20082008-02-22
Ah, it just Xilinx tools self terminates, not Xilinx.  I was
scared. ;-)

I found that 9.1 is much more stable then 9.2. So I'm skiping 9.2
completely and wait for 10.1 which is comming , I guess, in March.


Reply by Antti February 22, 20082008-02-22
Hi

any info on ISE 10.1 ?

maybe, HOPE really, Xilinx has done something to improve their
software quality.

It should be possible to write the GUI that doesnt self-terminate
itself so often.

I am trying to playback an SVF file, and it caused impact and ISE self-
termination.

there are possibilites to "CATCH" exceptions and recover the
application, but no,
Xilinx tools just terminate themself.

Antti