FPGARelated.com
Forums

Why is this group so quiet?

Started by Mike Field September 6, 2015
I was just wondering... why is this group so quiet?

With lots of interesting news like:

Microsoft Extends FPGA Reach From Bing To Deep Learning - http://www.theplatform.net/2015/08/27/microsoft-extends-fpga-reach-from-bing-to-deep-learning/

China's FPGA Company - http://www.electronicsweekly.com/mannerisms/fpga/chinas-fpga-company-2015-09/

AMD patent filing hints at FPGA plans in the pipeline - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08/11/amd_patent_filing_hints_at_fpga_plans_in_the_pipeline/

I would have expected at least a tiny bit of chatter...

Mike.
On 06/09/2015 22:24, Mike Field wrote:
> I was just wondering... why is this group so quiet?
Unfortunately there are too many other sources like LinkedIn, Stackoverflow, Vendors mailing lists.... I guess young(?) engineers find usenet not "cool" enough, no up/down votes, no tags for code, no need for a news server, etc Hans www.ht-lab.com
> > With lots of interesting news like: > > Microsoft Extends FPGA Reach From Bing To Deep Learning - http://www.theplatform.net/2015/08/27/microsoft-extends-fpga-reach-from-bing-to-deep-learning/ > > China's FPGA Company - http://www.electronicsweekly.com/mannerisms/fpga/chinas-fpga-company-2015-09/ > > AMD patent filing hints at FPGA plans in the pipeline - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08/11/amd_patent_filing_hints_at_fpga_plans_in_the_pipeline/ > > I would have expected at least a tiny bit of chatter... > > Mike. >
>I was just wondering... why is this group so quiet? >
because our next door neighbor is very noisy. Look at DSPrelated.com guys, 4 or five of them keep answering everyone, may be they robot members. Kaz --------------------------------------- Posted through http://www.FPGARelated.com
On 9/6/2015 5:24 PM, Mike Field wrote:
> I was just wondering... why is this group so quiet? > > With lots of interesting news like: > > Microsoft Extends FPGA Reach From Bing To Deep Learning - http://www.theplatform.net/2015/08/27/microsoft-extends-fpga-reach-from-bing-to-deep-learning/ > > China's FPGA Company - http://www.electronicsweekly.com/mannerisms/fpga/chinas-fpga-company-2015-09/ > > AMD patent filing hints at FPGA plans in the pipeline - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08/11/amd_patent_filing_hints_at_fpga_plans_in_the_pipeline/
AMD getting into the FPGA market would indeed be news. I seriously doubt that will be happening. There are a lot of financial and patent barriers. I can't currently read any of your links, but it could be interesting if China did get into the FPGA market. But do you think they will market much in the US? I expect they will be pushed as alternatives to the big name FPGAs for use in many Chinese products which are more and more designed in China. There aren't many Chinese chips with much complexity that are used in other parts of the world. It can be very hard to get much info that is clear. Microsoft has their hands in lots of things. That doesn't mean they will bring it to fruition. -- Rick
On Mon, 07 Sep 2015 10:25:48 -0500, kaz wrote:

>>I was just wondering... why is this group so quiet? >> >> > because our next door neighbor is very noisy. Look at DSPrelated.com > guys, > 4 or five of them keep answering everyone, may be they robot members.
If so I'm a pretty damned well programmed robot! (Actually, I think a USENET question-answering robot would be a cool thing for someone to try. After lurking for about a year you can answer most questions by just regurgitating answers to previous questions.) -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
> >(Actually, I think a USENET question-answering robot would be a cool >thing for someone to try. After lurking for about a year you can answer
>most questions by just regurgitating answers to previous questions.) > >-- > >Tim Wescott >Wescott Design Services >http://www.wescottdesign.com
The problem of DSPRelated G5 (Gang of 5) is not just answering posts but soon they 5 member gang start fighting each other on their comments and thoughts. It is in most cases waste of time and words to find any useful post. Kaz --------------------------------------- Posted through http://www.FPGARelated.com
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:25:39 -0500, kaz wrote:


>>(Actually, I think a USENET question-answering robot would be a cool >>thing for someone to try. After lurking for about a year you can answer > >>most questions by just regurgitating answers to previous questions.) >> >>-- >> >>Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com > > The problem of DSPRelated G5 (Gang of 5) is not just answering posts but > soon they 5 member gang start fighting each other on their comments and > thoughts. > > It is in most cases waste of time and words to find any useful post.
You may have a point there. So, if I'm going to pass a Turing test does this mean that I need to get offended easily? -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
Den mandag den 7. september 2015 kl. 20.11.10 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
> On 9/6/2015 5:24 PM, Mike Field wrote: > > I was just wondering... why is this group so quiet? > > > > With lots of interesting news like: > > > > Microsoft Extends FPGA Reach From Bing To Deep Learning - http://www.theplatform.net/2015/08/27/microsoft-extends-fpga-reach-from-bing-to-deep-learning/ > > > > China's FPGA Company - http://www.electronicsweekly.com/mannerisms/fpga/chinas-fpga-company-2015-09/ > > > > AMD patent filing hints at FPGA plans in the pipeline - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08/11/amd_patent_filing_hints_at_fpga_plans_in_the_pipeline/ > > AMD getting into the FPGA market would indeed be news. I seriously > doubt that will be happening. There are a lot of financial and patent > barriers. > > I can't currently read any of your links, but it could be interesting if > China did get into the FPGA market. But do you think they will market > much in the US? I expect they will be pushed as alternatives to the big > name FPGAs for use in many Chinese products which are more and more > designed in China. There aren't many Chinese chips with much complexity > that are used in other parts of the world. It can be very hard to get > much info that is clear. >
the company is Gowin semiconductor, http://hackaday.com/2015/08/24/two-new-fpga-families-designed-in-china/ maybe they will have learned something from Espressif and their ~1$ wifi chip As soon as English documentation and tools started to appear everyone and his cousin started doing stuff cool with them -Lasse
Tim Wescott wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:25:39 -0500, kaz wrote: > > >>> (Actually, I think a USENET question-answering robot would be a cool >>> thing for someone to try. After lurking for about a year you can answer >> >>> most questions by just regurgitating answers to previous questions.) >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com >> >> The problem of DSPRelated G5 (Gang of 5) is not just answering posts but >> soon they 5 member gang start fighting each other on their comments and >> thoughts. >> >> It is in most cases waste of time and words to find any useful post. > > You may have a point there. So, if I'm going to pass a Turing test does > this mean that I need to get offended easily? >
I think people do this when they think they might not pass a Turing test. -- Les Cargill
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 18:09:22 -0500, Les Cargill wrote:

> Tim Wescott wrote: >> On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:25:39 -0500, kaz wrote: >> >> >>>> (Actually, I think a USENET question-answering robot would be a cool >>>> thing for someone to try. After lurking for about a year you can >>>> answer >>> >>>> most questions by just regurgitating answers to previous questions.) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com >>> >>> The problem of DSPRelated G5 (Gang of 5) is not just answering posts >>> but soon they 5 member gang start fighting each other on their >>> comments and thoughts. >>> >>> It is in most cases waste of time and words to find any useful post. >> >> You may have a point there. So, if I'm going to pass a Turing test >> does this mean that I need to get offended easily? >> >> > > I think people do this when they think they might not pass a Turing > test.
Are you implying I can't pass a Turing test? I'm offended. Or maybe I'm simulating. Hmm. How to tell? -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com